Legal Opinion

Mott v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided December 18, 2012No. AC 33974PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ROBINSON, J.

The plaintiff in this premises liability action, Matthew Mott, appeals from the summary judgment rendered by the trial court in favor of the defendant, Wal-Mart Stores East, LP. The plaintiff claims on appeal that the court improperly granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment solely on the basis that the plaintiff failed to file an opposing affidavit in support of his objection to the motion for summary judgment. We agree and, accordingly, reverse the judgment of the trial court.

The record reveals the following undisputed facts and procedural history. In 2009, the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Allstate Insurance v. BarronSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
  2. Fisher v. Big Y Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
  3. Rockwell v. QuintnerConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
  4. HIMMELSTEIN v. Town of WindsorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2012
  5. Himmelstein v. Town of WindsorConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Mariano v. Hartland Building & Restoration Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2016
  2. Tarro v. Mastriani Realty, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
  3. Cyr v. VKB, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2019
  4. Luongo Construction & Development, LLC v. MacFarlaneConnecticut Appellate Court · 2017
  5. Nationstar Mortgage, LLC v. MolloConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API