Kehl v. Britzman
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, J.
Had the fact of condonation and that the parties were continuing to live together as husband and wife during the pendency of the divorce proceedings been presented timely to the court, judgment of divorce would not have been granted.
In appellant’s counterclaim there is in effect admission that he was served with a summons and complaint in the divorce action; that he accompanied his wife to the office of her attorney; that he entered into a stipulation providing, among other things, that she should have the homestead of the parties and its contents as a property settlement; that at the same…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Werner v. RiemerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1949
- Newcomb v. IngramWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
- Cody v. CodyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1898
- Ottstadt v. JardineWisconsin Supreme Court · 1938
- Mason v. West Park Realty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1927
3Cited by5 opinions
- In Re Estate of BootsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
- State v. BouzekCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1992
- Kehl v. BritzmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1951
- State v. SmithWisconsin Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. SmithWisconsin Supreme Court · 2005