Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

State v. Smith

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided July 6, 2005No. 2003AP1698-CRPublished

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

LOUIS B. BUTLER, JR., J.

¶ 35. (concurring in part, dissenting in part). The majority concludes that *79whether a "court of competent jurisdiction" issued a child support order is not an element of the crime of failure to pay child support under Wis. Stat. § 948.22. Majority op., ¶ 2. With this conclusion, I agree. The crime of felony child support contains the following elements: (1) that the defendant intentionally failed to provide child support; (2) that the intentional failure to provide support continued for 120 or more consecutive days; and (3) that the defendant knew or reasonably should…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. United States v. MortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. State v. HarveyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Village of Trempealeau v. MikrutWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Eberhardy v. Circuit Court for Wood CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1981

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API