Legal Opinion

Kehl v. Britzman

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 6, 1951Published

1Opinion of the Court

258 Wis. 513 (1951)

KEHL, Respondent,

vs.

BRITZMAN, Appellant.[*]

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

February 5, 1951.

March 6, 1951.

For the appellant there was a brief by Randolph R. Conners and Frederick F. Hillyer, both of Madison, and oral argument by Mr. Hillyer.

For the respondent there was a brief by George A. Hartman and Leo C. Hartman, both of Juneau, and oral argument by Leo C. Hartman.

FAIRCHILD, J.

Had the fact of condonation and that the parties were continuing to live together as husband and wife during the pendency of the divorce proceedings been presented timely to the court, judgment of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Werner v. RiemerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Newcomb v. IngramWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Cody v. CodyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Ottstadt v. JardineWisconsin Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Kehl v. BritzmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1951

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API