Legal Opinion

State v. Bouzek

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided April 2, 1992No. 91-2076-CRPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEich, C.J.

We hold in this case that a person convicted of violating a harassment injunction contrary to sec. 813.125, Stats., 1 may not collaterally attack the validity of the underlying injunction in a subsequent criminal prosecution for its violation.

The appellant, Alan Bouzek, consented to the issuance of the original injunction prohibiting him from having contact with the petitioner, C.A. He was charged with violating the injunction and entered into a negotiated plea agreement under which he pled guilty to the offense. He received an imposed-and-stayed twenty-month sentence and was placed on…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. RiekkoffWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
  2. State v. MadisonCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1984
  3. Kehl v. BritzmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1951

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. SmithWisconsin Supreme Court · 2005
  2. State v. SveumCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2002
  3. State v. CampbellWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006
  4. State v. JankowskiCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1992
  5. State v. CampbellWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API