Loew v. Interlake Iron Corp.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
In a stockholder’s derivative action, appellants appeal from an order dated May 18, 1945, denying their motion, pursuant to rule 106 of the Rules of Civil Practice, to dismiss the second amended complaint on the ground that it does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action; and from that part of an order dated July 10, 1945, which denied their motion pursuant to rule 103 of the Rules of Civil Practice, for an order striking paragraph “ Twenty-seventh ” from the said complaint as false, sham and prejudicial. Orders, insofar as appealed from, affirmed, with one bill of $10…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Kalmanash v. SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1943
- Gerdes v. ReynoldsNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
- Jacobson v. . Brooklyn Lumber Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1906
- Davis v. CohnAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940
- Oshrin v. Celanese Corporation of AmericaNew York Court of Appeals · 1943
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Geller v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2002
- Dinkes v. Glen Oaks Village, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1954
- International Packaging Corp. v. MarshallCivil Court of the City of New York · 1971
- McQuade v. CookNew York Supreme Court · 1948
- Sorin v. Shahmoon Industries, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1962
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.