Oshrin v. Celanese Corporation of America
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Lehman, Ch. J.
The allegation of paragraph twenty-first of the complaint “ that the individual defendants as directors did, by common accord and understanding, and as part of the plan pursued by the defendants, Camille Dreyfus and Henry Dreyfus, for the general conduct of the business and affairs of the corporate defendant, combine their common voting strength and power as such directors so as to cause the appointment of all or nearly all of them to corporate positions paying very lucrative emoluments ” is, standing alone, clearly insufficient to indicate that all or any of the individual…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Gerdes v. ReynoldsNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
- Walsh v. Van Ameringen-Haebler, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1931
3Cited by6 opinions
- D'Addario v. McNabNew York Supreme Court · 1973
- Leader v. LeaderNew York Supreme Court · 1957
- Loew v. Interlake Iron Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1946
- Cohen v. GordonNew York Supreme Court · 1959
- Haberman v. New York Ambassador, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1947
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.