Legal Opinion
Davis v. Cohn
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 1, 1940PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCohn, J.
We think that the sixth cause of action is insufficient in law and should have been dismissed. Paragraph 74, upon which the cause is predicated, reads as follows:
“ 74. That at various times, the defendants, Jack Cohn, Joe Brandt, and Harry Cohn, transferred to themselves or caused to be transferred for their individual or joint benefits, various sums of money or other assets of the Columbia Pictures Corporation without any resultant benefit to the corporation and to its damage. That such transfers were without notice to the stockholders and Were to the resultant damage to the corporation.”
To…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Gerdes v. ReynoldsNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
- Knowles v. . City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
- Meisel v. Central Trust Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1917
- Meisel v. . Central Trust Company of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
- Leech v. FullerNew York Supreme Court · 1939
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Rous v. CarlisleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941
- Loew v. Interlake Iron Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1946
- Greenberg v. Nusbaum's Department Store, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1962
- Cirrincione v. PolizziAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1961
- Abrams v. AllenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1946
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.