Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Alaska Bar Ass'n

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided May 14, 2004No. S-11215PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

Anderson filed a grievance with the Alaska Bar Association alleging various instances of attorney misconduct. After taking preliminary steps, Bar Counsel decided that a formal investigation was not warranted and so notified Anderson. When Anderson sought reconsideration, Bar Counsel forwarded the file to Board Discipline Liaison to review. Board Discipline Liaison concurred in Bar Counsel’s decision not to open an investigation.

*272Each of the above steps was authorized and taken pursuant to Bar Rule 22(a). What Anderson did next is not covered by any rule. He filed a “Notice of Appeal…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Citizens Coalition for Tort Reform, Inc. v. McAlpineAlaska Supreme Court · 1991
  2. State, Department of Fish & Game, Sport Fish Division v. MeyerAlaska Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Vick v. Board of Electrical ExaminersAlaska Supreme Court · 1981

4Cited by5 opinions

  1. McGee v. Alaska Bar AssociationAlaska Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Yankee v. City and Borough of JuneauAlaska Supreme Court · 2017
  3. In Re the Disciplinary Matter Involving a District Court JudgeAlaska Supreme Court · 2017
  4. Richard L. Abbott v. Kathaleen M. VavalaCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2022
  5. Richard L. Abbott v. Kathaleen M. VavalaCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API