Legal Opinion

In Re the Disciplinary Matter Involving a District Court Judge

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided March 10, 2017No. 7156 S-16032Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BOLGER, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

Following a disciplinary sanction, a judge was not recommended for retention by the Alaska Judicial Council. Although the judge chose not to campaign, an independent group supported his retention and campaigned on his behalf. After the election the Alaska Commission on Judicial Conduct filed a disciplinary complaint against the judge and later imposed an informal private admonishment on the judge because he did not publicly address allegedly misleading statements made by the independent group. Because the statements clearly originated with the independent…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. In Re HansonAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
  2. In Re the Proceeding Under AS 22.30.070(c) in Relation to JohnstoneAlaska Supreme Court · 2000
  3. In Re Inquiry Concerning a JudgeAlaska Supreme Court · 1990
  4. In the Matter of BoninMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
  5. In Re CummingsAlaska Supreme Court · 2009

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API