Legal Opinion

Yankee v. City and Borough of Juneau

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided October 20, 2017No. 7206 S-16098PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MAASSEN, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

A landowner contends that his neighbors’ fence violates two restrictive plat- notes. The neighboring properties are.in two different subdivisions, and the landowner is therefore not bound by the same restrictive plat notes that he seeks to enforce against his neighbors. The landowner complained about the fence to the Director of Juneau’s Community Development Department, but the Director responded that the fence was allowed, citing longstanding policy.

The landowner appealed to the Planning Commission, which affirmed the Director’s decision. The landowner…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Heckler v. ChaneySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Newman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967
  3. Inmates of Attica Correctional Facility v. Nelson A. RockefellerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
  4. Public Defender Agency v. Superior Court, Third Judicial DistrictAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
  5. K & L DISTRIBUTORS, INC. v. MurkowskiAlaska Supreme Court · 1971

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Deanna Smith v. State of Alaska, Department of CorrectionsAlaska Supreme Court · 2025
  2. Russell Baker v. Alaska State Commission for Human Rights and Federal Express CorporationAlaska Supreme Court · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API