Legal Opinion

Crain and Denbo, Inc. v. Harris & Harris Const. Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 15, 1959No. 305PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.

The Aetna Insurance Company has three assignments of error. The first two. are to Judge Paul’s conclusions of law Numbers One and Two, and the third is to.the entry, of the.order. Harris & Harris Construction Company, Inc., filed no brief in this Court, 'but it has three similar assignments of error in the Record.

Neither of the defendants has any exception to Judge Paul’s findings of fact. A reading of the Record shows that they are supported by competent evidence, and there seems to be no controversy in respect to their correctness. . ■ ■ . ;

J-udge Paul in his order did not pass upon the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Rhyne v. . LipscombeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1898
  2. Howle v. Twin States Express, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  3. Lovegrove v. LovegroveSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  4. Latham v. . LathamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
  5. Interstate Cooperage Co. v. Eureka Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1909

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Harris & Harris Construction Co. v. Crain & Denbo, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  2. Stephenson v. BartlettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2004
  3. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Petroleum Transit Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  4. Doss v. NowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  5. Aarp v. Am. Family Prepaid Legal Corp.North Carolina Business Court · 2007

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API