Legal Opinion
Stephenson v. Bartlett
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided April 22, 2004No. 94PA02-3, 24A04PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EDMUNDS, Justice.
Because these cases are procedurally entangled, our first task is to distinguish them. On 16 November 2001, the plaintiffs in Stephenson v. Bartlett (Stephenson) filed in Superior Court, Johnston County, their first amended complaint, alleging that the 2001 legislative redistricting plans for the North Carolina Senate and House (the 2001 plans), passed by the North Carolina General Assembly after the 2000 census in accordance with Article I, Section 2 of the United States Constitution and Article II, Sections 3 and 5 of the North Carolina Constitution, were flawed. The…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Stephenson v. BartlettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2002
- Gardner v. GardnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- Maines v. City of GreensboroSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- State Ex Rel. Edmisten v. TuckerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
- Stephenson v. BartlettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2003
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Pender County v. BartlettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2007
- Dean v. LeakeDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2008
- Jenkins v. Hearn Vascular Surgery, P.A.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
- Pay Tel Communications, Inc. v. Caldwell CountyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
- Harper v. HallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2023
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.