Legal Opinion

Doss v. Nowell

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 12, 1966PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

The finding of the trial judge that neither party is a resident of Catawba County is supported by the evidence and is, therefore, binding upon this Court. Upon that finding, Catawba County is not a proper venue for the trial of this action. G.S. 1-82. If it be assumed that, prior to the institution of this action, the plaintiff ceased to be a resident of Mecklenburg County and became a resident of New Hanover County so that Mecklenburg County is not a proper venue, this would not deprive the Superior Court of Mecklenburg County of jurisdiction to try the action. It is ground only for removal…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Nello L. Teer Co. v. Hitchcock Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  2. Crain and Denbo, Inc. v. Harris & Harris Const. Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1959

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Holbrook v. HolbrookCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
  2. Wnc Holdings, LLC v. Alliance Bank & Trust Co.North Carolina Business Court · 2012
  3. Clarke v. ClarkeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API