Legal Opinion

Lovegrove v. Lovegrove

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 4, 1953No. 92PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBabNhill, J.

We are met at the threshold of this appeal by a question of jurisdiction of which we must take judicial notice ex mero motu. Shepard v. Leonard, 223 N.C. 110, 25 S.E. 2d 445; S. v. Clarke, 220 N.C. 392, 17 S.E. 2d 468; S. v. Morgan, 226 N.C. 414, 38 S.E. 2d 166; S. v. Jones, 227 N.C. 94, 40 S.E. 2d 700; S. v. Miller, 225 N.C. 213, 34 S.E. 2d 143.

The right to demand a change of venue and the authority of the courts to remove a cause from one county to another for trial is purely statu tory. 56 A.J. 4, 5, 49, 61. And the clerk of tbe Superior Court, whether he was acting as such or as ex…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. State v. . MorganSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
  2. Rhyne v. . LipscombeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1898
  3. State v. . MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  4. Shepard v. . LeonardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  5. State v. . JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Austin v. AustinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
  2. Coats v. Sampson County Memorial Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  3. Jackson v. BobbittSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  4. Richardson v. RichardsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  5. Yount v. YountSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API