Legal Opinion

Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Petroleum Transit Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 23, 1966PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PER Cueiam.

The proper venue for an action instituted by a foreign corporation domesticated in this state is in the county in which it maintains its principal place of business. G.S. 1-82; Crain & Denbo v. Construction Co., 250 N.C. 106 (112), 108 S.E. 2d 122.

For the purpose of establishing domestication in the manner required by G.S. 58-150, plaintiff offered in evidence certification by the Commissioner of Insurance that plaintiff had complied with each *758and every provision of Article 17, Chapter 58, of the General Statutes. This certificate was sufficient to support the court’s finding that…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Crain and Denbo, Inc. v. Harris & Harris Const. Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  2. Noland Company v. Laxton Construction CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Moore Golf, Inc. v. Shambley Wrecking Contractors, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974
  2. Denham v. Shellman Grain Elevator, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1971
  3. Denham v. Shellman Grain Elevator, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API