Legal Opinion

State v. Zapetis

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided October 6, 1993No. 93-2784PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

The State filed a petition for writ of common law certiorari requesting review of the trial court’s order denying the State’s motion for neuropsychological examination prior to a hearing on respondent’s competency to stand trial. We deny review.

The trial court appointed two experts to examine the respondent. Additionally, the respondent’s own expert examined him. The State’s motion for access to the respondent to permit examination by its expert was denied without prejudice to renew it if it later appeared that one of the experts had relied upon the findings of another expert instead of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Martin-Johnson, Inc. v. SavageSupreme Court of Florida · 1987
  2. State v. PettisSupreme Court of Florida · 1988
  3. State v. BattleDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1974
  4. Bannister v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bishop v. CaudillKentucky Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Vuthy Seng v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2005
  3. Yancy v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
  4. Bishop v. CaudillKentucky Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Bishop v. CaudillKentucky Supreme Court · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API