Bishop v. Caudill
Kentucky Supreme Court
1ConcurrenceKeller, Justice
I agree that a writ should issue to prohibit the Appellee trial judge from enforcing his order requiring Appellant to submit to a competency examination conducted by a mental health professional retained by the Commonwealth, and I thus concur in the majority’s holding. I write separately, however, because I disagree with the majority’s conclusion that it is never proper for a trial court to order an independent competency evaluation by the Commonwealth’s expert. In particular, I fear that today’s majority opinion’s holding that the Commonwealth “does not have the right to an independent…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Estelle v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Stanford v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 1990
- Edmonds v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 1979
- McCracken County Fiscal Court v. GravesKentucky Supreme Court · 1994
- Baqleh v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.