Yancy v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
The defendant, whom the circuit court found to be incompetent, petitions for a writ of certiorari. She seeks to quash the court’s order directing her “to submit to a risk assessment evaluation conducted by the expert retained by the State of Florida for such evaluation.” She argues that the order departs from the essential requirements of law because: (1) no statute or rule authorizes a “risk assessment evaluation” of a defendant adjudicated incompetent; and (2) the order requires her to be examined by a state-retained expert instead of a court-appointed expert on a competency-related issue.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Parkin v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1970
- Caraballo v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2010
- State v. HicksonSupreme Court of Florida · 1993
- Dillbeck v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1994
- Olges v. DoughertyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. RoundtreeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012