Legal Opinion

Yancy v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided May 30, 2012No. 4D12-709PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

The defendant, whom the circuit court found to be incompetent, petitions for a writ of certiorari. She seeks to quash the court’s order directing her “to submit to a risk assessment evaluation conducted by the expert retained by the State of Florida for such evaluation.” She argues that the order departs from the essential requirements of law because: (1) no statute or rule authorizes a “risk assessment evaluation” of a defendant adjudicated incompetent; and (2) the order requires her to be examined by a state-retained expert instead of a court-appointed expert on a competency-related issue.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Parkin v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1970
  2. Caraballo v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2010
  3. State v. HicksonSupreme Court of Florida · 1993
  4. Dillbeck v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1994
  5. Olges v. DoughertyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. RoundtreeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API