Legal Opinion

Bishop v. Caudill

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided October 23, 2003No. 2002-SC-0372-MRPublished

1Opinion of the Court

118 S.W.3d 159 (2003)

Dwayne Earl BISHOP, Appellant,

v.

John David CAUDILL, Judge Floyd Circuit Court, Appellee, and

Commonwealth of Kentucky, Real Party in Interest.

No. 2002-SC-0372-MR.

Supreme Court of Kentucky.

October 23, 2003.

Dennis Stutsman, Harolyn R. Howard, Emily Holt, Department of Public Advocacy, Frankfort, Counsel for Appellant.

A.B. Chandler III, Attorney General of Kentucky, Ian G. Sonego, Assistant Attorney General, Criminal Appellate Division, Office of the Attorney General, Frankfort, Counsel for Appellee.

GRAVES, Justice.

Appellant, Dwayne Earl Bishop, has been indicted in the Floyd…

Also in this document: Concurrence · Keller; Concurrence · Keller; Dissent.

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Estelle v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Godinez v. MoranSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Mills v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Stanford v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Edmonds v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 1979

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API