Vuthy Seng v. Commonwealth
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtMarshall, C.J.
At issue in this case is whether a criminal defendant may be required to submit to an examination by an expert of the Commonwealth’s choosing to evaluate his competency to stand trial. After a court-appointed expert concluded that Vuthy Seng (defendant) was not competent to stand trial, a judge in the Superior Court allowed the Commonwealth’s motion that the defendant submit to a second competency examination to be conducted by an expert of its choosing, “subject,” she ruled, “to the procedures set forth in *537Mass. R. Crim. P. 14 (b) (2) (B),” 378 Mass. 874 (1979).1 The defendant petitioned a…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Dusky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Drope v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Estelle v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Medina v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Hanlon v. RollinsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Commonwealth v. SargentMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2007
- Commonwealth v. OliveiraMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2016
- Commonwealth v. HarrisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2014
- Commonwealth v. ChatmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2016
- Johnston v. MitchellCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2017
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.