Legal Opinion

Vuthy Seng v. Commonwealth

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided December 15, 2005PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarshall, C.J.

At issue in this case is whether a criminal defendant may be required to submit to an examination by an expert of the Commonwealth’s choosing to evaluate his competency to stand trial. After a court-appointed expert concluded that Vuthy Seng (defendant) was not competent to stand trial, a judge in the Superior Court allowed the Commonwealth’s motion that the defendant submit to a second competency examination to be conducted by an expert of its choosing, “subject,” she ruled, “to the procedures set forth in *537Mass. R. Crim. P. 14 (b) (2) (B),” 378 Mass. 874 (1979).1 The defendant petitioned a…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Dusky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. Drope v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Estelle v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Medina v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. Hanlon v. RollinsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. SargentMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2007
  2. Commonwealth v. OliveiraMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2016
  3. Commonwealth v. HarrisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2014
  4. Commonwealth v. ChatmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2016
  5. Johnston v. MitchellCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2017

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API