Bambauer v. Menjoulet
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment declaring that appellant has no right in or to gravel deposits located on certain lands owned by respondent. In 1919 appellant, by deed, conveyed to respondent’s predecessor in interest Section 6, Township 11 South, Range 11 East, M.D.B. & M., in the County of Merced. The deed contained the following language:
“. . . reserving and excepting therefrom an undivided one-half interest, in favor of the grantor, Mathilde Bambauer, her heirs and assigns, in and to all mineral, and oil rights, and in and to all minerals and oils in the demised premises, to be held by…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Holloway Gravel Co. v. McKowenSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1942
- State v. GuillotSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1942
- Farrell v. SayreSupreme Court of Colorado · 1954
- Psencik v. WesselsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1947
- Yuba Investment Co. v. Yuba Consolidated Gold FieldsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Carrier v. Salt Lake CountyUtah Supreme Court · 2004
- State Ex Rel. State Highway Commission v. TrujilloNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1971
- Geothermal Kinetics, Inc. v. Union Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1977
- Keith v. KinneyColorado Court of Appeals · 2005
- Pariani v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.