Legal Opinion

Geothermal Kinetics, Inc. v. Union Oil Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 15, 1977No. Civ. 40447PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SCOTT, Acting P. J.

The issue presented here is whether geothermal resources belong to the owner of the mineral estate or the owner of the surface estate. Wé conclude that the general grant of minerals in, on or under the property includes a grant of geothermal resources, including steam therefrom.

The owners of the surface estate, Union Oil Company of California, Magma Power Company, Thermal Power Company, and George and Hazel Curry, appeal from a judgment quieting title to the geothermal steam and power and geothermal resources in Geothermal Kinetics, Inc., the owner of the mineral…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Acker v. GuinnTexas Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Northern Natural Gas Co. v. GroundsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1971
  3. Hollenbach v. HaycraftSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Fleming Foundation v. Texaco, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1960
  5. United States v. Union Oil Company of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. R & R Energies v. Mother Earth Industries, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Post v. PratiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
  3. Spurlock v. Santa Fe Pacific RailroadCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
  4. Phillips Petroleum Co. v. County of LakeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
  5. Pariani v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API