Legal Opinion
Pariani v. State of California
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 20, 1980No. Civ. 47185PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
TAYLOR, P. J.
In this quiet title and declaratory relief action, Pariani, Ottoboni and Emerson, three groups of landowners, appeal from an adverse judgment decreeing that the mineral rights reservations in the patents reserved to the State of California (State) 1 the geothermal resources underlying the patented lands located in Sonoma and Lake Counties, commonly known as The Geysers. The owners contend that: 1) the geothermal resources were not expressly reserved by the patents or the applicable statues; 2) the court erred in concluding that the geothermal resources were “mineral…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- In Re Marriage of BouquetCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- California Employment Stabilization Commission v. PayneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Northern Pacific Railway Company v. SoderbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Acker v. GuinnTexas Supreme Court · 1971
- United States v. Union Oil Company of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Red Mountain, LLC v. Fallbrook Public Utility DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- Spurlock v. Santa Fe Pacific RailroadCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
- Phillips Petroleum Co. v. County of LakeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
- County of Sonoma v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
- Occidental Geothermal, Inc. v. SimmonsDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1982
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.