Yuba Investment Co. v. Yuba Consolidated Gold Fields
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Charles W. Slack, W. H. Carlin, A. F. Jones and Thos. H. Breeze for Appellant.
1Opinion of the CourtWilbur, J.
This is an action to quiet title. Plaintiff recovered judgment and defendant appeals. Both parties claim under James O’Brien, who on December 6, 1901, made a quitclaim deed of the property to the United States of America, containing certain agreements, reservations, and exceptions. The interpretation of this deed forms the basis of this controversy. The title of the United States was conveyed to the defendant October 30, 1911. Whatever interest in the property remained in the grantor, except as noted near the end of this opinion, was conveyed to the plaintiff. The plaintiff contends, and the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Noonan v. PardeeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1901
- Williams v. GibsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1887
- Collinsville Granite Co. v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
- Fitzgerald v. County of ModocCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- Bibby v. BunchSupreme Court of Alabama · 1912
3Cited by12 opinions
- City of Manhattan Beach v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
- Western Aggregates, Inc. v. County of YubaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Pinsky v. SloatCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- Raab v. CasperCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- Kerr Land & Timber Co. v. EmmersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.