Vloedman v. Cornell
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtLandau, P. J.
The question before us is whether a statute providing for an award of attorney fees to a successful plaintiff in an action for damages to crops applies when the action was initiated after the statute’s effective date but was based on conduct that occurred before its effective date. The trial court concluded that the attorney fee statute applies, and we agree.
Herbert Vloedman, Jr., and HRV Ranches, Inc., a corporation owned by Vloedman and his family (collectively referred to as the Vloedmans), developed and farmed 40 acres of land in Lake County owned by the Cornell family, who were absentee…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Whipple v. HowserOregon Supreme Court · 1981
- Spicer v. Benefit Ass'n of Railway EmployeesOregon Supreme Court · 1933
- Perkins v. Willamette Industries, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1975
- State v. LanigCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
- Newell v. WestonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Robert Camel Contracting, Inc. v. KrautscheidCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
- Black v. ArizalaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
- Lovinger v. Lane CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
- Cuff v. Department of Public Safety Standards & TrainingCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
- Montessori School of Eugene, Inc. v. Lane County AssessorOregon Tax Court · 2000
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.