Legal Opinion

Perkins v. Willamette Industries, Inc.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided November 20, 1975PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHowell, J.

Plaintiff filed this action to recover damages for personal injuries which he incurred on premises of the defendant in Dallas, Oregon. Defendant filed a supplemental answer alleging that defendant and plaintiff’s employer shared joint supervision and control of the premises and that, therefore, under ORS 656.154 plaintiff was restricted to the benefits of the Workmen’s Compensation Act. The trial court found for defendant, and plaintiff appeals.

Both the defendant and plaintiff’s employer are subject to the Workmen’s Compensation Act. At the time of the accident, the defendant operated a…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Joseph v. LoweryOregon Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Spicer v. Benefit Ass'n of Railway EmployeesOregon Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Thomas v. FoglioOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Pruett v. LININGEROregon Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Lane v. Brotherhood of Locomotive Enginemen & FiremenOregon Supreme Court · 1937

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Whipple v. HowserOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  2. In re Packaged Seafood Products Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2017
  3. Brooks Resources Corp. v. Department of RevenueOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Groesbeck v. NapierSupreme Court of Iowa · 1979
  5. Rhodes v. EckelmanOregon Supreme Court · 1986

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API