Legal Opinion

Spicer v. Benefit Ass'n of Railway Employees

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 14, 1933PublishedCited by 76 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] Action by Leslie William Spicer and another, minors, by Mary E. Crandall, guardian, against Benefit Association of Railway Employees, a corporation, on a policy of accident insurance which promised to pay the beneficiaries of whom plaintiff was the guardian, $2,700 in the event Leslie V. Spicer lost his life "solely through external, violent, and accidental means". The answer denied that insured's death had occurred in that manner. From a judgment for plaintiff,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Western Commercial Travelers' Ass'n v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1898
  2. McCrosson v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  3. Carnes v. Iowa State Traveling Men's Ass'nSupreme Court of Iowa · 1898
  4. Lippold v. KiddOregon Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Cary v. Preferred Accident InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1906

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by76 opinions

  1. Whipple v. HowserOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Joseph v. LoweryOregon Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Nitchals v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1979
  4. Nelson v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  5. State v. EndsleyOregon Supreme Court · 1958

71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API