Legal Opinion

McDonald v. Unaka Timber Co.

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1889PublishedCited by 8 opinions

FROM KNOX. Appeal from Chancery Court of Knox County. H. R. Gibson, Cli.

1Opinion of the Court

Polices, «T.

This is a bill by complainant to recover judgment upon a note for two thousand dollars, executed by the defendant company. The defendant, by answer and cross-bill, alleges that the note sued on was the last installment upon the sum of six thousand five hundred dollars, which had been agreed to be paid to complainant by defendant, in consideration of complainant’s undertaking to cut timber belonging to defendant, in Yancey County, JST. C., and deliver same in Cane River, in said county, “in a good, workmanlike manner.” This contract was reduced to writing on March 20, 1888, and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Messmore v. New York Shot & Lead Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1869
  2. East Tennessee, Virginia & Georgia Railroad v. HaleTennessee Supreme Court · 1886

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Railroad v. Cabinet Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1900
  2. International Harvester Co. of America v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1919
  3. Chisholm & Moore Manufacturing Co. v. United States Canopy Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Machine Co. v. Compress Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Kendrick-Roan Grain & Elevator Co. v. WeaverTennessee Supreme Court · 1913

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API