Chisholm & Moore Manufacturing Co. v. United States Canopy Co.
Tennessee Supreme Court
FROM KNOX. Appeal from the Chancery Court of Knox County.— Joseph W. Sneed, Chancellor.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Neil
Tbe original bill in this case was filed for tbe purpose of collecting tbe purchase money for some castings alleged to bave been sold by tbe complainant to tbe defendant. Thereupon tbe defendant filed a cross \ bill to recover damages for breach of tbe contract under which tbe castings were purchased. -Tbe court of chancery appeals, after deducting a certain amount, not now in controversy, for castings accepted and used by tbe cross complainant, found that there was a balance due to tbe latter under its claim of damages, and rendered a decree therefor. From this decree tbe original…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- United States v. BehanSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Griffin v. . ColverNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
- Howard v. Stillwell & Bierce Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Philadelphia, Wilmington & Baltimore Railroad v. HowardSupreme Court of the United States · 1852
- The Amiable NancySupreme Court of the United States · 1818
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Cecil Corley Motor Co., Inc. v. General Motors Corp.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1974
- Black v. Love & Amos Coal Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1947
- Ford Motor Company v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1969
- Waggoner Motors, Inc. v. Waverly Church of ChristCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2004
- Maple Manor Hotel, Inc. v. Metropolitan Government of Nashville & Davidson CountyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1975
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.