ConnolLy v. Potts
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
WELLS, Judge.
The issues presented in this appeal relate to the burden upon a party seeking to foreclose under the terms of a deed of trust securing payment of a promissory note to establish that he is the holder of the note.
A party seeking to go forward with foreclosure under a power of sale must establish, inter alia, by competent evidence, the existence of a valid debt of which he is the holder. G.S. 45-21.16(d), In re Foreclosure of Burgess, 47 N.C. App. 599, 267 S.E. 2d 915, appeal dismissed, 301 N.C. 90, --- S.E. 2d --- (1980). The Uniform Commercial Code, G.S. 25-1-201(20) defines a…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hotel Corp. v. Taylor and Fletcher v. Foremans, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- In Re the Foreclosure of the Deed of Trust of BurgessCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
- Liles v. MyersCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
- Furst v. LoftinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976
- Connolly v. PottsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
3Cited by15 opinions
- In Re the Foreclosure by SimpsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
- In Re the Foreclosure of a Deed of Trust Executed by AdamsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
- Greene v. Tr. Servs. Of Carolina, LLCCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016
- In re the Foreclosure of the Deed of Trust from ManningCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
- In Re Foreclosure of a Deed of Trust Executed by RawlsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2015
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.