Legal Opinion

ConnolLy v. Potts

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided August 16, 1983No. 8229SC512PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WELLS, Judge.

The issues presented in this appeal relate to the burden upon a party seeking to foreclose under the terms of a deed of trust securing payment of a promissory note to establish that he is the holder of the note.

A party seeking to go forward with foreclosure under a power of sale must establish, inter alia, by competent evidence, the existence of a valid debt of which he is the holder. G.S. 45-21.16(d), In re Foreclosure of Burgess, 47 N.C. App. 599, 267 S.E. 2d 915, appeal dismissed, 301 N.C. 90, --- S.E. 2d --- (1980). The Uniform Commercial Code, G.S. 25-1-201(20) defines a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hotel Corp. v. Taylor and Fletcher v. Foremans, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  2. In Re the Foreclosure of the Deed of Trust of BurgessCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  3. Liles v. MyersCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
  4. Furst v. LoftinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976
  5. Connolly v. PottsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. In Re the Foreclosure by SimpsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
  2. In Re the Foreclosure of a Deed of Trust Executed by AdamsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
  3. Greene v. Tr. Servs. Of Carolina, LLCCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016
  4. In re the Foreclosure of the Deed of Trust from ManningCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
  5. In Re Foreclosure of a Deed of Trust Executed by RawlsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2015

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API