Legal Opinion

Furst v. Loftin

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided May 5, 1976No. 7515SC1011PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRITT, Judge.

Appeal of Defendants Freeland

Did the trial court err in entering summary judgment against defendants Freeland? We hold that it did.

At the outset we note that the trial court made extensive “findings of fact.” We repeat again that in passing upon a *253motion for summary judgment pursuant to G.S. 1A-1, Rule 56, the court does not decide facts but makes a determination whether an issue exists which is germane to the cause of action. Kessing v. Mortgage Corp., 278 N.C. 523, 180 S.E. 2d 823 (1971) ; Moore v. Bryson, 11 N.C. App. 260, 181 S.E. 2d 113 (1971). If findings of fact are…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Kessing v. National Mortgage CorporationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  2. Koontz v. City of Winston-SalemSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  3. Singleton v. StewartSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  4. Hyde Insurance Agency, Inc. v. Dixie Leasing Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975
  5. Woodard v. MordecaiSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Blodgett v. MartschUtah Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Sprouse v. North River InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  3. Nytco Leasing, Inc. v. Dan-Cleve Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976
  4. ConnolLy v. PottsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
  5. Garrison v. BlakeneyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API