Connolly v. Potts
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
WELLS, Judge.
The issues presented in this appeal relate to the burden upon a party seeking to foreclose under the terms of a deed of trust securing payment of a promissory note to establish that he is the holder of the note.
A party seeking to go forward with foreclosure under a power of sale must establish, inter alia, by competent evidence, the existence of a valid debt of which he is the holder. G.S. 45-21.16(d), In re Foreclosure of Burgess, 47 N.C. App. 599, 267 S.E. 2d 915 (1980). The Uniform Commercial Code, G.S. 25-1-201(20) defines a “holder” to be “a person who is in possession of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hotel Corp. v. Taylor and Fletcher v. Foremans, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- In Re the Foreclosure of the Deed of Trust of BurgessCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
- Liles v. MyersCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
- Furst v. LoftinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976
3Cited by1 opinion
- ConnolLy v. PottsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983