Legal Opinion

In Re Foreclosure of a Deed of Trust Executed by Rawls

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided October 6, 2015No. 15-248PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ZACHARY, Judge.

*317 Turnip Investments, LLC (respondent) appeals from an order authorizing the substitute trustee to proceed with a foreclosure sale to recover money owed on a debt secured by a note and deed of trust on property located in Hickory, North Carolina (the property). On appeal, respondent argues that the trial court erred by allowing the foreclosure to proceed, on the grounds that E*Trade (petitioner) failed to prove that it was the holder of the note evidencing the debt, and that respondent had not personally defaulted on the loan. We conclude that the trial court did not err by…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Matter of HelmsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1997
  2. Knutton v. CofieldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  3. Carolina Power & Light Co. v. City of AshevilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2004
  4. Horvath v. Bank of New York, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2011
  5. In Re the Foreclosure by SimpsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Deutsche Bank National Trust Company v. Thomas P. WuenschWisconsin Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Holt v. N.C. Dep't of Transp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016
  3. Dawkins v. Wilmington Trust Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017
  4. Deutsche Bank National Trust Company v. Thomas P. WuenschWisconsin Supreme Court · 2018
  5. Holt v. N.C. Dep't of Transp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API