Legal Opinion

Hunter v. Mailey Fid. Cas. Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 21, 1927No. Appeal 187 and 199PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Linn, J.,

These appeals, one by an employer, the other by his insurance carrier, are from an award of $92 compensation made by the referee, affirmed by the board and also by the common pleas.

While at work on July 6, 1924, claimant struck his upper right arm against a rack, suffered severe pain then and throughout the night. He did not report the matter to his employer until September 1924; then a lump appeared at the place of injury, and he consulted a physician. In July 1925 a specimen of the growth was analyzed. He was then absent from work two weeks, while in a hospital, during…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Chase v. Emery Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  2. Smith v. Primrose Tapestry Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  3. Hughes v. American International Shipbuilding Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Creighton v. Continental Roll & Steel Foundry Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  2. Tinsman v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  3. Hickey v. Cudahy Packing Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
  4. Schrecengost v. O. K. Heilman Trucking Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  5. Cotton v. John Wood Mfg. Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API