Legal Opinion

Tinsman v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 26, 1935No. Appeal, 224PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Keller, P. J.,

On April 12, 1929, Maynard Tinsman, the claimant, was injured in the course of his employment with the defendant, Jones & Laughlin Steel Corporation. His right thumb was caught between a crane cable and a piece of timber and badly crushed, requiring the amputation of the first phalanx. A compensation agreement was entered into with his employer, and approved by the Workmen’s Compensation Board, which called for the payment of maximum compensation for 30 weeks, ending November 15, 1929, being the compensation allowable under section 306 (c) for the loss of half a thumb.

S…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Chase v. Emery Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  2. Zupicick v. P. & R. C. & I. Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  3. Kitchen v. Miller Bros. Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  4. Somerton v. the Bell Tele. Co. of Pa.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  5. Barlock v. Orient Coal & Coke Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1934

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Creighton v. Continental Roll & Steel Foundry Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  2. Yanik v. Pittsburgh Terminal Coal Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  3. Strickland v. Baugh & Sons Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  4. Mancini v. Pennsylvania Rubber Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  5. Casper v. State Workmen's Insurance FundSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API