Legal Opinion

Cotton v. John Wood Mfg. Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 11, 1937No. Appeal, 37PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Baldrige, J.,

On September 6, 1934, George Cotton, the complainant, was seriously injured by the bursting of a tank which he was testing with compressed ,air. The employer furnished immediate medical attention, which disclosed that the claimant’s left wrist and hand were incapacitated. Upon request of defendant’s superintendent, claimant reported the following day with his arm in a sling and was given work as messenger, later valve tester, and then watchman. In August, 1935, he was temporarily laid off, but about a week later was reemployed as janitor, and continued his duties as…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Chase v. Emery Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  2. Tinsman v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  3. Elkins v. Cambria Library Assn.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  4. Hunter v. Mailey Fid. Cas. Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1927

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Creighton v. Continental Roll & Steel Foundry Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  2. Hickey v. Cudahy Packing Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
  3. Schrecengost v. O. K. Heilman Trucking Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  4. Long v. PhiladelphiaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  5. Cosenza v. General Baking Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API