Legal Opinion

Russell v. Landau

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 1, 1954No. Civ. 20181PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, P. J.

From the order quashing service of summons on the ground that defendant was a nonresident temporarily in California as a party litigant and as a witness to testify in judicial proceedings, plaintiff appeals. Appellant contends that under the circumstances, the rule of immunity against service of process cannot be fairly invoked by respondent. This claim necessitates a review of the background of the controversy.

The Parties

Appellant is a daughter of Morris Marks Landau, the deceased brother of respondent. In December, 1941, in the Union of South Africa, Morris created an inter vivos trust with…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Estate of Bristol v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Stewart v. RamsaySupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  3. Doak v. BrusonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Mullen v. SanbornCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1894
  5. Davenport v. Superior Court of Imperial CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Brodsky v. Seaboard Realty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1962
  2. Palmer v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  3. St. John v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  4. Pointer v. GhavamDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1985
  5. Republic Productions, Inc. v. American Federation of MusiciansDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1959

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API