Legal Opinion
Oppenheimer v. City of Los Angeles
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 1, 1951No. Civ. No. 18034Published
1Opinion of the Court
104 Cal.App.2d 545 (1951)
JOHN G. OPPENHEIMER, Appellant,
v.
CITY OF LOS ANGELES et al., Respondents.
Civ. No. 18034.
California Court of Appeals. Second Dist., Div. Three.
June 1, 1951.
John G. Oppenheimer, in pro. per., for Appellant.
Ray L. Chesebro, City Attorney, Bourke Jones, Assistant City Attorney, and Roland Wilson, Deputy City Attorney, for Respondents.
VALLEE, J.
Appeal by plaintiff from (1) a judgment of dismissal entered pursuant to an order sustaining, without leave to amend, the demurrers of the city of Los Angeles, Clemence B. Horrall, V. Fallon, and W. Erskine to the second amended…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Kent v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Collins v. OwensCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- Kaufman v. BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- Brindamour v. MurrayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Oppenheimer v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.