Legal Opinion

Security Loan & Trust Co. v. Boston & South Riverside Fruit Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided October 24, 1899No. L.A. Nos. 476, 477, 478, 479PublishedCited by 56 opinions

APPEALS from a judgment of the Superior Court of Riverside County, from a judgment, and from orders refusing to set the judgment aside. John L. Campbell, Judge, presiding. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

All these appeals involve exactly the same questions; they were argued and submitted together and will be so decided.

The references in the briefs and arguments of counsel are to the transcript in appeal No. 478; and we will consider and determine the case presented in that transcript — the other appeals involving exactly the same questions, although in one set of appeals the United States Trust Company is the appellant, and in the other the Boston South Riverside Fruit Company is the appellant, both appellants being foreign corporations.

The case upon which the appeal in No. 478 arises is an…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In re ClarkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Burdette v. CorganSupreme Court of Kansas · 1881
  3. Lowe v. StringhamWisconsin Supreme Court · 1861
  4. Gilbert-Arnold Land Co. v. O'HareWisconsin Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Alderson v. WhiteWisconsin Supreme Court · 1873

3Cited by56 opinions

  1. Olcese v. Justice's Court of the First Judicial Twp.California Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Goodwine v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Lacey v. BertoneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  4. DIAL 800 v. FesbinderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
  5. Remsberg v. Hackney Manufacturing Co.California Supreme Court · 1917

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API