Allen v. Bryson
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from liar dm District Court. Both parties are attorneys at law, and this action was brought to recover for professional services performed by the plaintiff for the defendant, and for personal property sold. Several defenses were pleaded, which are sufficiently referred to in the opinion. Trial by jury. Yerdict and judgment ifbr the plaintiff, and defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtSeevers, J.
i. tracttce court??'effect niai of appeilant’s abstract, no transcript being filed., I. Preliminary to a consideration of the errors assigned, an objection to the abstract made by the appellee must be determined. The abstract states that “ all the evidence introduced, and all offers of evidence made, on the trial, together with all , ... ’ , 56 the obieetions made and exceptions taken by . r J counsel, and all rulings of the court upon said trial, and the entire record in said cause, is contained therein.” In an abstract filed by appellee it is stated that appellant’s abstract is not correct;…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Cook v. BradleySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1828
- Forbes v. . WallerNew York Court of Appeals · 1862
- Martin v. HamlinMichigan Supreme Court · 1869
- Dawson v. DawsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1861
- Singer Sewing Machine Co. v. HolcombSupreme Court of Iowa · 1874
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Harper v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1911
- Meginnes v. McChesneySupreme Court of Iowa · 1916
- Irons Investment Co. v. RichardsonWashington Supreme Court · 1935
- Tank v. RohwederSupreme Court of Iowa · 1896
- Dullard v. SchaferSupreme Court of Iowa · 1960
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.