Legal Opinion

Dawson v. Dawson

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided December 21, 1861PublishedCited by 19 opinions

Appeal from Fremont District Court. A statement of the facts is embodied in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtBaldwin, J.

The plaintiff brought his action before a justice of the peace, by which he sought to recover of the defendant a compensation for the support of Joseph Dawson the father of defendant, and the uncle of plaintiff. The averment in the petition is, that the said Joseph Dawson was a pauper, in absplute want of the common necessaries of life; that the defendant wholly failed and neglected to provide for the sustenance and support of his father, the said Joseph; that the petitioner in consequence of such failure and neglect was compelled to provide for the victualing, clothing and care of the said…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cook v. BradleySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1828
  2. Edwards v. DavisNew York Supreme Court · 1819
  3. Almy v. HarrisNew York Supreme Court · 1809
  4. Boone County v. RuhlSupreme Court of Iowa · 1859

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. People v. HillIllinois Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Allen v. BrysonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1885
  3. Guthrie County v. ConradSupreme Court of Iowa · 1907
  4. In the Interest of H.S. And S.N., Minor Children, V.R., MotherSupreme Court of Iowa · 2011
  5. Cushman v. HasslerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1891

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API