Bennett v. Bennett
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtTooze, J.
The plaintiff, Clyde N. Bennett, who was awarded a decree of divorce from his wife, Bernice Bennett, the defendant herein, after marriage of about one year, appeals from that portion of the decree of the trial court which awarded $2,000 in cash to the defendant as “lump sum alimony.” Plaintiff asserts that the trial court had no jurisdiction to require him, as the party not at fault, to pay alimony and relies upon ORS 107.100 (1), (c), to sustain his position.
ORS 107.100 provides in part as follows:
“ (1) Whenever a marriage is declared void or dissolved, the court has power to further decree…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Henderson v. HendersonOregon Supreme Court · 1900
- State Ex Rel. Casey v. CaseyOregon Supreme Court · 1944
- Nelson v. NelsonOregon Supreme Court · 1947
- Cogswell v. CogswellOregon Supreme Court · 1945
3Cited by19 opinions
- Rhodes v. RhodesAlaska Supreme Court · 1962
- Hess v. SeegerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
- Interstate Roofing, Inc. v. Springville Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 2009
- Mattox v. CassadyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1986
- Schnitzer Investment Corp. v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's of LondonOregon Supreme Court · 2006
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.