Summit Hosiery Co. v. Gottschall
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Kephart,
Plaintiff recovered damages for wrongful levy and sale of its property under an execution issued by defendant against John E. Quinn. The circumstances leading up to the sale are these. Quinn, engaged in the manufacture of stockings, had borrowed money from Gottschall to continue the business, and had secured through a bailment lease from the Lehigh Silk Hosiery Company the machinery in question. Quinn owed Gottschall for money advanced, $7,800, and the Lehigh Hosiery Company, $2,500. Since business was not prospering, he sold it to Lurker for $3,000. Lurker paid…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Mayer v. WalterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1870
- Root v. Republic Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
- Atlas Portland Cement Co. v. American Brick & Clay Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
- Montgomery Web Co. v. Dienelt, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Montgomery County1890
- Pennsylvania Knitting Mills of Reading v. Bibb Manufacturing Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1900
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Shane v. Gulf Refining Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
- Commonwealth Trust Co. of Pittsburgh v. Reconstruction Finance Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1941
- Fenton Storage Co. v. FeinsteinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
- Hilton Credit Corp. v. WilliamsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
- Garis v. Hanff.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.