Legal Opinion

Fenton Storage Co. v. Feinstein

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 6, 1937No. Appeal, 173PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Stadtfeld, J.,

This is an action in trespass to recover damages for the alleged malicious abuse of legal process. The issue was raised by a statement of claim, and an affidavit of defense raising questions of law contending that the statement of claim discloses no cause of action against the defendant. The questions of law raised in the affidavit of defense were sustained and judgment was entered for defendant, in an opinion by Lamberton, J. This appeal followed.

The facts are accurately stated in the opinion of the court below, from which we quote as follows: “It is averred that…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Hauser v. BartowNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
  2. Mayer v. WalterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1870
  3. Germantown T. Co. v. Emhardt (No. 1)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  4. Garland v. WilsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  5. Saliem v. GlovskySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1934

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Nolan v. Allstate Home Equipment Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1959
  2. Harvey v. PincusDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1982
  3. Dauphin Deposit Trust Co. v. E.C.E.C.S. Co., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Cumberland County1973
  4. Schmick v. Northwestern Production Corp., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Centre County1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API