Legal Opinion

Garis v. Hanff.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 14, 1934No. Appeal 566PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Baldbige, J.,

On August 11, 1932, the plaintiff obtained a judgment against the defendant, in the sum of $2,013.12. About one month later, defendant entered into a written contract with McClintic-Marshall Corporation, garnishee, for painting a bridge, for which he was to be paid $6,773'. The work was suspended in the winter of 1932. When the weather conditions improved to permit the resumption of work, defendant was unable to raise the money to finish his contract.

On March 6, 1933, defendant, with other associates, caused to be formed a corporation, under the name of T. R. Hanff &…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Austin-Nichols & Co. v. Union Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  2. Knight v. Red B. T. Co. and A. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  3. Summit Hosiery Co. v. GottschallSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  4. Krell v. JacobsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Golder v. BogashSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API