Legal Opinion

Shane v. Gulf Refining Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 29, 1933No. Appeal 104PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

James, J.,

This is an action against a constable and judgment creditor to recover damages for a levy alleged to have been improperly made on plaintiff’s goods on a judgment entered against Louis Oistatcher, plaintiff’s father-in-law.

Constable Ashbrook, who also conducted a collection agency, .obtained judgment on December 3, 1931, on behalf of the Gulf Refining Company, against Louis Oistatcher for oil delivered to the home of Oistatcher. After several demands upon Oistatcher at his home at 542 South Melville Street, his daughter, wife of the plaintiff, in a conversation with the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Mayer v. WalterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1870
  2. Burk v. HowleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1897
  3. McMurtrie v. StewartSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1853
  4. Siegel v. Netherlands Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1915
  5. Summit Hosiery Co. v. GottschallSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Adelman Et Ux. v. RosenbaumSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  2. Morphy v. ShipleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  3. B. Cohen & Sons Caterers, Inc. v. New Plan Realty Trust (In Re B. Cohen & Sons Caterers, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1989
  4. Fenton Storage Co. v. FeinsteinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  5. Smith v. HoughwotSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API