Legal Opinion

Southern Pacific Co. v. Superior Court

California Supreme Court

Decided March 12, 1940No. L. A. 17334PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCurtis, J.

By this proceeding, petitioner seeks to prohibit the Superior Court of the County of Los Angeles from requiring petitioner to obey a certain subpoena duces tecum directed to a representative of petitioner in an action entitled, “Raymond Houch v. Southern Pacific Company et al.” Said subpoena was issued by the clerk of said superior court upon the application of the plaintiff in said action, accompanied by an .affidavit as required by section 1985 of the Code of Civil Procedure. No order of court was required by the rules of said court for the issuance of a subpoena duces tecum and no order of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Sun-Ray Cloak Co. v. Unity Cloak Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939
  2. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United States v. MpasstasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Shively v. StewartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  2. People v. WarburtonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  3. People v. SkeltonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
  4. Vaughan v. BroadfootSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  5. Spencer v. Hibernia BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API