Legal Opinion

Spencer v. Hibernia Bank

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 28, 1960No. Docket Nos. 19193, 19194, 19195PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTobriner, J.

If, as Judge Jerome Frank has written, each ease is but an excursion into history, 1 we must view the litigation in its historical setting and in the context of the times in which it originated. Within those limitations we have examined the unique structure of the first Hibernia corporation of 1859 and the subsequent corporation of 1864 to determine if, in the posture of the instant eases, appellants establish valid claims to ownership of assets here. The task has necessarily been made more difficult by the long lapse of time since the origin of the alleged rights. Our inquiry convinces us…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Desny v. WilderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Eagle Oil & Refining Co. v. PrenticeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Walsh v. WalshCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  4. California Lettuce Growers, Inc. v. Union Sugar Co.California Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Coyne v. KrempelsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Gafcon, Inc. v. Ponsor & AssociatesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  2. Groves v. PrickettCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
  3. Burke v. Hibernia BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  4. Big Bear Properties, Inc. v. GhermanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
  5. Tu-Vu Drive-In Corp. v. AshkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API