Legal Opinion
Shively v. Stewart
California Supreme Court
Decided December 16, 1966No. Sac. No. 7756PublishedCited by 54 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtTraynob, C. J.
Petitioners John P. Shively and Seymour Smith, licensed physicians authorized to practice medicine and surgery in the State of California, brought this proceeding to compel issuance of subpoenas duces tecum to obtain depositions and documents from the Executive Secretary of the State Board of Medical Examiners and from the board's attorney prior to disciplinary hearings.
On May 20,1966, Wallace W. Thompson, executive secretary of the board, filed accusations against petitioners stating that they aided, abetted, attempted, offered to procure, and performed criminal abortions on named women on…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- United States v. Morton Salt Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Abelleira v. District Court of AppealCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Ballard v. Superior Court of San Diego CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
- Jones v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- Powell v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- Pitchess v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- In Re CoxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Viculin v. Department of Civil ServiceMichigan Supreme Court · 1971
- McCartney v. Commission on Judicial QualificationsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Pet v. Department of Health ServicesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.